Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- New Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Revealed February 2014
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR Digital III was introduced 5 years before the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the GR Digital III grades against the DP2 Quattro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
GR Digital III | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Ricoh GR Digital III
DP2 Quattro | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | July 2009 | Fresher by 55 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma DP2 Quattro
GR Digital III | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Display resolution | 920k | 920k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital III offers outside measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the GR Digital III against the DP2 Quattro.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and DP2 Quattro is 92 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by looking through specs. The photograph here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital III and DP2 Quattro.
All in all, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital III having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will render greater detail using its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older GR Digital III will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-07-27 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 45mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208g (0.46 lb) | 395g (0.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $399 | $931 |