Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Released April 2012
- Previous Model is Sigma SD1
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and SD1 Merrill (15MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR Digital III was manufactured 3 years prior to the SD1 Merrill which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a simple overview of how the GR Digital III scores against the SD1 Merrill in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sigma SD1 Merrill. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
GR Digital III | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Ricoh GR Digital III
SD1 Merrill | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2012 | July 2009 | Newer by 32 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma SD1 Merrill
GR Digital III | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III offers outside dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Sigma SD1 Merrill has measurements of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") having a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the GR Digital III compared to the SD1 Merrill.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and SD1 Merrill is 92 and 57 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions only by going over technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and SD1 Merrill.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will offer you greater detail due to its extra 5MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2009-07-27 | 2012-04-10 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 15MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4800 x 3200 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 secs | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 lbs) | 790 gr (1.74 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $399 | $2,339 |