Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma SD9
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Introduced November 2002
- Later Model is Sigma SD10
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma SD9 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma SD9, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Ricoh and Sigma. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and SD9 (APS-C) come with different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR Digital III was unveiled 6 years later than the SD9 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the GR Digital III grades against the SD9 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma SD9. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sigma SD9
GR Digital III | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2009 | November 2002 | Fresher by 82 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 130k | Clearer display (+790k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
SD9 | GR Digital III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma SD9
GR Digital III | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III offers physical measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has proportions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma SD9 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the GR Digital III versus the SD9.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and SD9 is 92 and 54 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and SD9.
Clearly, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital III using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Ricoh GR Digital III will result in more detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The younger GR Digital III should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sigma SD9 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2009-07-27 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 2268 x 1512 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 130k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208g (0.46 lbs) | 950g (2.09 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $399 | $3,001 |