Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Updated by Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and Quattro (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR Digital III was introduced 7 years before the Quattro which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the GR Digital III grades versus the Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sigma sd Quattro. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sigma Quattro
GR Digital III | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Ricoh GR Digital III
Quattro | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | July 2009 | More modern by 80 months | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 920k | Clearer display (+700k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma Quattro
GR Digital III | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital III has outer measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital III vs the Quattro.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and Quattro is 92 and 63 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by checking a spec sheet. The pic underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital III and Quattro.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III using its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Sigma Quattro will give extra detail using its extra 19 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sigma sd Quattro |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-07-27 | 2016-02-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 29 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 1,620k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.8 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 lbs) | 625 gr (1.38 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $399 | $738 |