Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Updated by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Launched February 2016
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and Quattro (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The GR Digital III was introduced 7 years before the Quattro which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the GR Digital III grades versus the Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sigma Quattro

 GR Digital III Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 Quattro GR Digital III 
LaunchedFebruary 2016July 2009More modern by 80 months
Display resolution1620k920kClearer display (+700k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma Quattro

 GR Digital III Quattro 
Manually focus Very precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurements
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital III has outer measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital III vs the Quattro.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and Quattro is 92 and 63 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by checking a spec sheet. The pic underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital III and Quattro.

As you can see, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III using its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Sigma Quattro will give extra detail using its extra 19 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
40
you can focus manually
exports RAW formats
low MP (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
81
manual focus
MP count amazing (29MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
provides face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography information
Sigma Quattro Street photography information
55
exports RAW formats
no moving screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
59
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
environment proof
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than others in class (625 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography highlights
Sigma Quattro Sports photography highlights
17
can't change focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect AF
70
MP count amazing (29 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proof
comes with phase detect autofocus
slow fps (3.8 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography advice
Sigma Quattro Travel photography advice
63
built-in flash
good max aperture (f1.9)
low MP (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
55
environment proof
MP count amazing (29MP)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than others in class (625g)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
45
you can focus manually
good max aperture (f1.9)
pretty good screen size (3")
exports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
72
manual focus
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
MP count amazing (29MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
environment proof
does not have image stabilization
lack of Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging highlights
Sigma Quattro Vlogging highlights
25
good max aperture (f1.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external mic jack
22
provides face detection autofocus
does not posses selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low res video ( pixels)
lack of external microphone socket
more heavy than others in class (625g)
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma Quattro
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISigma sd Quattro
General Information
Brand Ricoh Sigma
Model type Ricoh GR Digital III Sigma sd Quattro
Category Small Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2009-07-27 2016-02-23
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by GR engine III Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 29 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) -
Max aperture f/1.9 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Number of lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 4.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920k dots 1,620k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 3.8 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 208 gr (0.46 lbs) 625 gr (1.38 lbs)
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $399 $738