Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro H
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
78 Imaging
72 Features
59 Overall
66
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma Quattro H, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Sigma. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and Quattro H (APS-H) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR Digital III was announced 7 years prior to the Quattro H which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the GR Digital III scores vs the Quattro H with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sigma sd Quattro H. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sigma Quattro H
GR Digital III | Quattro H |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Ricoh GR Digital III
Quattro H | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | July 2009 | More modern by 80 months | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 920k | Sharper screen (+700k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma Quattro H
GR Digital III | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III has got physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro H has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sigma Quattro H in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the GR Digital III compared to the Quattro H.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and Quattro H is 92 and 78 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes only by viewing specs. The image here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and Quattro H.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III using its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Sigma Quattro H will render greater detail with its extra 35MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-07-27 | 2016-02-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-H |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 45 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6200 x 4152 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 1,620k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.8 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 lb) | - |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $399 | $1,134 |