Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A9 II
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
62 Imaging
75 Features
93 Overall
82
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A9 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Bump to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 678g - 129 x 96 x 76mm
- Released October 2019
- Old Model is Sony A9
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A9 II Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A9 II, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and A9 II (24MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and A9 II (Full frame) offer totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR Digital III was manufactured 11 years prior to the A9 II which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony A9 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the GR Digital III scores vs the A9 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A9 II Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony Alpha A9 Mark II. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Sony A9 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony A9 II
GR Digital III | A9 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A9 II over the Ricoh GR Digital III
A9 II | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2019 | July 2009 | More modern by 124 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1440k | 920k | Sharper display (+520k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony A9 II
GR Digital III | A9 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A9 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital III features exterior measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sony A9 II has sizing of 129mm x 96mm x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A9 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the GR Digital III versus the A9 II.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and A9 II is 92 and 62 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A9 II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The image here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital III and A9 II.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Sony A9 II will show greater detail due to its extra 14 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A9 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A9 II Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-07-27 | 2019-10-03 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 51200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 1,440k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208 grams (0.46 lb) | 678 grams (1.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 129 x 96 x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 690 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous, 3 or 5 frames) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Storage slots | Single | Dual |
Launch cost | $399 | $4,498 |