Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A350

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
53
Features
47
Overall
50

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A350 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Refreshed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Sony A350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Revealed June 2008
  • Replacement is Sony A380
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A350 Overview

In this write-up, we are looking at the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony A350, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and A350 (14MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and A350 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GR Digital III was revealed 14 months after the A350 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the GR Digital III scores vs the A350 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony A350

 GR Digital III A350 
RevealedJuly 2009June 2008Newer by 14 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 A350 GR Digital III 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony A350

 GR Digital III A350 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital III provides exterior measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony A350 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).

Analyze the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony A350 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the GR Digital III and the A350.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A350 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and A350 is 92 and 62 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading a spec sheet. The image below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital III and A350.

As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sony A350 will deliver extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The newer GR Digital III will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography info
Sony A350 Portrait photography info
40
focusing manually
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
71
manual focus
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Street photography with Sony A350
55
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
66
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
more heavy than competitors (674g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography features
Sony A350 Sports photography features
17
focal length is fixed (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
has no phase detect AF
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
has phase detect AF
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography factors
Sony A350 Travel photography factors
63
flash built-in
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
MP count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
51
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (674g)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A350 as a Landscape photography camera
45
focusing manually
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
64
manual focus
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
does not have Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Vlogging camera
Sony A350 as a Vlogging camera
25
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have mic jack
9
lack of video recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony A350
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISony Alpha DSLR-A350
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh GR Digital III Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
Class Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2009-07-27 2008-06-06
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip GR engine III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4592 x 3056
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) -
Maximal aperture f/1.9 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 4.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 None
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 208 grams (0.46 pounds) 674 grams (1.49 pounds)
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 65
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 595
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $399 $600