Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A900
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Announced October 2008
- Renewed by Sony A99
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A900 Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony A900, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Ricoh and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and A900 (25MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and A900 (Full frame) provide totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR Digital III was manufactured 10 months after the A900 and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the GR Digital III grades versus the A900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony A900
GR Digital III | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2009 | October 2008 | Newer by 10 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
A900 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 922k | 920k | Sharper display (+2k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony A900
GR Digital III | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital III offers outer dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sony A900 has sizing of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony A900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the GR Digital III vs the A900.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and A900 is 92 and 54 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading a spec sheet. The image below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital III and A900.
As you can see, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony A900 will offer you more detail due to its extra 15MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent GR Digital III is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A900 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2009-07-27 | 2008-10-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6048 x 4032 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 lb) | 895 gr (1.97 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 880 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | One | 2 |
Retail cost | $399 | $2,736 |