Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-C3
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34


91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Released August 2011
- Older Model is Sony NEX-3
- Renewed by Sony NEX-F3

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony NEX-C3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) use different sensor size.

The GR Digital III was revealed 3 years before the NEX-C3 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the GR Digital III grades vs the NEX-C3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony NEX-C3
GR Digital III | NEX-C3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
NEX-C3 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 25 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony NEX-C3
GR Digital III | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III has got exterior dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-C3 has measurements of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony NEX-C3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital III against the NEX-C3.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and NEX-C3 is 92 and 91 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing purely by going through specifications. The graphic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and NEX-C3.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital III using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Sony NEX-C3 will show greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The older GR Digital III will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-07-27 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 grams (0.46 pounds) | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $399 | $343 |