Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front
Portability
86
Imaging
57
Features
60
Overall
58

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Revealed July 2009
  • Newer Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Sony NEX-F3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
  • Revealed August 2012
  • Superseded the Sony NEX-C3
  • Updated by Sony NEX-3N
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview

Lets look a bit more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony NEX-F3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and NEX-F3 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The GR Digital III was revealed 4 years earlier than the NEX-F3 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the GR Digital III matches up vs the NEX-F3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony NEX-F3

 GR Digital III NEX-F3 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 NEX-F3 GR Digital III 
RevealedAugust 2012July 2009More modern by 37 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony NEX-F3

 GR Digital III NEX-F3 
Focus manually More precise focus
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Screen resolution920k920kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital III has physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-F3 has specifications of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).

Take a look at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony NEX-F3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the GR Digital III versus the NEX-F3.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and NEX-F3 is 92 and 86 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's tough to see the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over specs. The image here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital III and NEX-F3.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III having a tinier sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony NEX-F3 will deliver more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography details
Sony NEX-F3 Portrait photography details
40
focusing manually
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
74
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography info
Sony NEX-F3 Street photography info
55
delivers RAW formats
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/1.7")
76
screen tilts up and down
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography details
Sony NEX-F3 Sports photography details
17
can't change focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
no phase detect AF
53
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
better than average battery (470 CIPA)
low fps (6.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography information
Sony NEX-F3 Travel photography information
63
has built in flash
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
69
better than average battery (470 CIPA)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Landscape photography camera
Sony NEX-F3 as a Landscape photography camera
45
focusing manually
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
good sized screen (3 inch)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
70
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is decent (3")
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (470 shots)
no image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging info
Sony NEX-F3 Vlogging info
25
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic port
27
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
doesn't have external mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony NEX-F3
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISony Alpha NEX-F3
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh GR Digital III Sony Alpha NEX-F3
Category Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2009-07-27 2012-08-16
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip GR engine III Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 1600 16000
Lowest native ISO 64 200
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) -
Max aperture f/1.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 121
Crop factor 4.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 6.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 208g (0.46 lb) 314g (0.69 lb)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 73
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 1114
Other
Battery life - 470 photographs
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $399 $470