Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Revealed August 2012
- Superseded the Sony NEX-C3
- Updated by Sony NEX-3N
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony NEX-F3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and NEX-F3 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR Digital III was revealed 4 years earlier than the NEX-F3 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the GR Digital III matches up vs the NEX-F3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony NEX-F3
GR Digital III | NEX-F3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
NEX-F3 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2012 | July 2009 | More modern by 37 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony NEX-F3
GR Digital III | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital III has physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-F3 has specifications of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony NEX-F3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the GR Digital III versus the NEX-F3.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and NEX-F3 is 92 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to see the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over specs. The image here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital III and NEX-F3.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III having a tinier sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony NEX-F3 will deliver more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-07-27 | 2012-08-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR engine III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208g (0.46 lb) | 314g (0.69 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $399 | $470 |