Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony a3500
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
69 Imaging
63 Features
54 Overall
59
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- New Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Older Model is Sony A3000
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony a3500 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony a3500, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and a3500 (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and a3500 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR Digital III was revealed 5 years before the a3500 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony a3500 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the GR Digital III matches up vs the a3500 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony a3500 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony Alpha a3500. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Sony a3500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony a3500
GR Digital III | a3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony a3500 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
a3500 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2014 | July 2009 | Fresher by 56 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony a3500
GR Digital III | a3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony a3500 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital III comes with physical measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Sony a3500 has dimensions of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") along with a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony a3500 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the GR Digital III compared to the a3500.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and a3500 is 92 and 69 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony a3500 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading through specifications. The graphic below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital III and a3500.
Plainly, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital III using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony a3500 will give greater detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The older GR Digital III is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony a3500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony a3500 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha a3500 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-07-27 | 2014-03-21 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | BIONZ image |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5456 x 3632 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 pounds) | 411 gr (0.91 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $399 | $398 |