Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H200
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34


67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Released January 2013

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H200 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony H200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and H200 (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and H200 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.

The GR Digital III was released 4 years before the H200 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the GR Digital III matches up versus the H200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony H200
GR Digital III | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
H200 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 42 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony H200
GR Digital III | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital III enjoys outside measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sony H200 has sizing of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") with a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony H200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the GR Digital III and the H200.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and H200 is 92 and 67 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and H200.
As you can see, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Sony H200 will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H200 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-07-27 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 2920 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 20cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 6.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) | 530 grams (1.17 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Battery type | - | AA |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $399 | $250 |