Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 front
Portability
62
Imaging
45
Features
41
Overall
43

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • New Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Sony H400
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
  • 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
  • Launched February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 Overview

Its time to examine more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and H400 (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and H400 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The GR Digital III was manufactured 5 years prior to the H400 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the GR Digital III grades vs the H400 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony H400

 GR Digital III H400 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 H400 GR Digital III 
LaunchedFebruary 2014July 2009More modern by 55 months

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony H400

 GR Digital III H400 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital III comes with outside measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sony H400 has specifications of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") with a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the GR Digital III versus the H400.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and H400 is 92 and 62 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The pic below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and H400.

Plainly, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Sony H400 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Portrait photography with Sony H400
40
manual focus
supports RAW files
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
40
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Street photography camera
Sony H400 as a Street photography camera
55
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
43
image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
heavier than competitors (628g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography information
Sony H400 Sports photography information
17
focal length is fixed (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect AF
51
amazing zoom range (25-1550mm 62.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography advice
Sony H400 Travel photography advice
63
built-in flash
good max aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
53
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
long reach (1550mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors (628 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography information
Sony H400 Landscape photography information
45
manual focus
good max aperture (f1.9)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
supports RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
44
really wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging information
Sony H400 Vlogging information
25
good max aperture (f1.9)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
no external microphone jack
26
really wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
includes mic support
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
heavier than competitors (628 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony H400
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-H400
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh GR Digital III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-07-27 2014-02-13
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor GR engine III Bionz(R)
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 5152 x 3864
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 25-1550mm (62.0x)
Maximum aperture f/1.9 f/3.4-6.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - Clear Photo LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 201k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 8.80 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 X 720
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 208g (0.46 pounds) 628g (1.38 pounds)
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $399 $268