Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34


62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- New Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Launched February 2014

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and H400 (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and H400 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.

The GR Digital III was manufactured 5 years prior to the H400 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the GR Digital III grades vs the H400 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony H400
GR Digital III | H400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
H400 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 55 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony H400
GR Digital III | H400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital III comes with outside measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sony H400 has specifications of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") with a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the GR Digital III versus the H400.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and H400 is 92 and 62 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The pic below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and H400.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Sony H400 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony H400 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-07-27 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5152 x 3864 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.4-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 8.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 X 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208g (0.46 pounds) | 628g (1.38 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $399 | $268 |