Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Replacement is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Launched February 2013
- Superseded the Sony HX200V
- Updated by Sony HX400V
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony HX300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and HX300 (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and HX300 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GR Digital III was revealed 4 years prior to the HX300 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the GR Digital III grades versus the HX300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony HX300
GR Digital III | HX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
HX300 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2013 | July 2009 | More modern by 43 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony HX300
GR Digital III | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III provides outside dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has measurements of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony HX300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the GR Digital III against the HX300.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and HX300 is 92 and 63 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and HX300.
As you can see, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony HX300 will give you more detail because of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-27 | 2013-02-20 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208 grams (0.46 pounds) | 623 grams (1.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $399 | $339 |