Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
44
Features
51
Overall
46

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Revealed July 2009
  • Replacement is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Sony HX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
  • Launched February 2013
  • Superseded the Sony HX200V
  • Updated by Sony HX400V
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300 Overview

Here, we are reviewing the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony HX300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and HX300 (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and HX300 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The GR Digital III was revealed 4 years prior to the HX300 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the GR Digital III grades versus the HX300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony HX300

 GR Digital III HX300 

Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 HX300 GR Digital III 
LaunchedFebruary 2013July 2009More modern by 43 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution921k920kClearer display (+1k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony HX300

 GR Digital III HX300 
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Display size3"3"Same display measurements
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III provides outside dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has measurements of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony HX300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the GR Digital III against the HX300.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and HX300 is 92 and 63 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and HX300.

As you can see, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony HX300 will give you more detail because of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Portrait photography camera
Sony HX300 as a Portrait photography camera
40
focusing manually
delivers RAW formats
low MP (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
42
you can focus manually
MP count good (20MP)
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Street photography with Sony HX300
55
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
50
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Optical)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
more heavy than competition (623g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Sports photography with Sony HX300
17
focal length is fixed (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect autofocus
55
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography features
Sony HX300 Travel photography features
63
built-in flash
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
low MP (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
54
MP count good (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
long reach (1200mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (623 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography information
Sony HX300 Landscape photography information
45
focusing manually
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
48
you can focus manually
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Vlogging camera
Sony HX300 as a Vlogging camera
25
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of microphone support
25
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of external microphone socket
more heavy than competition (623g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony HX300
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
General Information
Brand Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh GR Digital III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-07-27 2013-02-20
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip GR engine III -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Highest aperture f/1.9 f/2.8-6.3
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 920k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) Electronic
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate - 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 208 grams (0.46 pounds) 623 grams (1.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal -
Card slots One One
Retail cost $399 $339