Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX400V
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34


62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Announced February 2014
- Previous Model is Sony HX300

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX400V Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX400V, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and HX400V (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and HX400V (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.

The GR Digital III was manufactured 5 years earlier than the HX400V which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony HX400V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the GR Digital III matches up vs the HX400V when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX400V Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Sony HX400V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony HX400V
GR Digital III | HX400V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Ricoh GR Digital III
HX400V | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 55 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony HX400V
GR Digital III | HX400V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX400V Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III offers outer measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony HX400V has proportions of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX400V in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the GR Digital III and the HX400V.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and HX400V is 92 and 62 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX400V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading specifications. The image below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and HX400V.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony HX400V will offer you extra detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX400V Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX400V Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-07-27 | 2014-02-12 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 lbs) | 660 gr (1.46 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $399 | $448 |