Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX50V
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
![Ricoh GR Digital III front Ricoh GR Digital III front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-GR-Digital-III/Ricoh-GR-Digital-III-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-HX50V/Sony-HX50V-front.jpg)
89 Imaging
44 Features
57 Overall
49
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX50V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5 - 6.3) lens
- 272g - 108 x 64 x 38mm
- Launched April 2013
- Superseded the Sony HX30V
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX50V Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony HX50V, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and HX50V (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and HX50V (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The GR Digital III was manufactured 4 years before the HX50V which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the GR Digital III matches up vs the HX50V with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX50V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Sony HX50V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony HX50V
GR Digital III | HX50V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX50V over the Ricoh GR Digital III
HX50V | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 45 months |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony HX50V
GR Digital III | HX50V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX50V Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital III features exterior dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sony HX50V has dimensions of 108mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 272 grams (0.60 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony HX50V in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital III versus the HX50V.
![Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX50V size comparison Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX50V size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-GR-Digital-III-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-HX50V-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and HX50V is 92 and 89 respectively.
![Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX50V top view buttons comparison Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX50V top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-GR-Digital-III-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-HX50V-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX50V Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading a spec sheet. The pic below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and HX50V.
As you can see, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Sony HX50V will deliver greater detail due to its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
![Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX50V sensor size comparison Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX50V sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Ricoh-GR-Digital-III-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-HX50V-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX50V Screen and ViewFinder
![Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX50V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX50V Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-GR-Digital-III-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-HX50V-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX50V Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-27 | 2013-04-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 2920 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.5 - 6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | XtraFine LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208g (0.46 pounds) | 272g (0.60 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 108 x 64 x 38mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $399 | $439 |