Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 II
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34


58 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Announced June 2015
- Old Model is Sony RX10
- Later Model is Sony RX10 III

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 II Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony RX10 II, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Sony. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and RX10 II (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and RX10 II (1") boast different sensor dimensions.

The GR Digital III was launched 6 years prior to the RX10 II which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the GR Digital III grades against the RX10 II for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sony RX10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony RX10 II
GR Digital III | RX10 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 II over the Ricoh GR Digital III
RX10 II | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2015 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 71 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+309k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony RX10 II
GR Digital III | RX10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III has physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sony RX10 II has proportions of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") and a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony RX10 II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the GR Digital III versus the RX10 II.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and RX10 II is 92 and 58 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over technical specs. The image underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital III and RX10 II.
As you can tell, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Sony RX10 II will offer extra detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 II Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 II Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-27 | 2015-06-10 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 10.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 pounds) | 813 gr (1.79 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 531 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $399 | $998 |