Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 IV
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
52 Imaging
54 Features
82 Overall
65
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Announced September 2017
- Succeeded the Sony RX10 III
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 IV Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony RX10 IV, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and RX10 IV (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and RX10 IV (1") come with different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR Digital III was announced 9 years before the RX10 IV and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the GR Digital III grades versus the RX10 IV for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 IV Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sony RX10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony RX10 IV
GR Digital III | RX10 IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Ricoh GR Digital III
RX10 IV | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2017 | July 2009 | More recent by 98 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1440k | 920k | Crisper display (+520k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony RX10 IV
GR Digital III | RX10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital III has outside measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 IV has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony RX10 IV in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the GR Digital III vs the RX10 IV.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and RX10 IV is 92 and 52 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing technical specs. The graphic here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and RX10 IV.
As you have seen, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital III with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Sony RX10 IV will result in greater detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older GR Digital III will be behind in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-07-27 | 2017-09-12 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 1,440k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 24.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 lbs) | 1095 gr (2.41 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $399 | $1,698 |