Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX100 III
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
89 Imaging
51 Features
77 Overall
61
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX100 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 290g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Introduced May 2014
- Replaced the Sony RX100 II
- Successor is Sony RX100 IV
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX100 III Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony RX100 III, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and RX100 III (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and RX100 III (1") feature different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GR Digital III was revealed 5 years earlier than the RX100 III which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the GR Digital III scores versus the RX100 III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX100 III Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Sony RX100 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony RX100 III
GR Digital III | RX100 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 III over the Ricoh GR Digital III
RX100 III | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2014 | July 2009 | More modern by 58 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 920k | Clearer screen (+309k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony RX100 III
GR Digital III | RX100 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX100 III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital III has got physical measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sony RX100 III has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 290 grams (0.64 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony RX100 III in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the GR Digital III versus the RX100 III.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and RX100 III is 92 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX100 III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching specs. The image here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and RX100 III.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony RX100 III will render greater detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX100 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX100 III Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-07-27 | 2014-05-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p/120p), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208 grams (0.46 pounds) | 290 grams (0.64 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 495 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, self-portrait, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $399 | $748 |