Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony TX5
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
96 Imaging
33 Features
33 Overall
33
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony TX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 148g - 94 x 57 x 18mm
- Introduced February 2010
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony TX5 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony TX5, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the GR Digital III (10MP) and the TX5 (10MP) is fairly close but the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and TX5 (1/2.4") come with totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR Digital III was announced 6 months before the TX5 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony TX5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the GR Digital III matches up versus the TX5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony TX5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sony TX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony TX5
GR Digital III | TX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX5 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
TX5 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony TX5
GR Digital III | TX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2009 | February 2010 | Same age | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony TX5 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital III features outside dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony TX5 has dimensions of 94mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony TX5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the GR Digital III vs the TX5.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and TX5 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony TX5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions just by researching technical specs. The image below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and TX5.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer the same exact megapixels but not the same sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III offers the larger sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF simpler.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony TX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony TX5 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-07-27 | 2010-02-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.5-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 2.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208 grams (0.46 lb) | 148 grams (0.33 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 94 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $399 | $239 |