Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both offered by Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR Digital IV was launched 3 years before the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the GR Digital IV matches up against the WG-4 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
GR Digital IV | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | 460k | Crisper screen (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
WG-4 GPS | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | September 2011 | More recent by 29 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
GR Digital IV | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has got outer measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital IV against the WG-4 GPS.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and WG-4 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and WG-4 GPS.
As you can see, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital IV due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2011-09-15 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lb) | 235 gr (0.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 pictures | 240 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $599 | $210 |