Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy NX
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
82 Imaging
62 Features
76 Overall
67
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy NX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Old Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 495g - 137 x 101 x 26mm
- Introduced June 2013
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy NX Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung Galaxy NX, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and Galaxy NX (20MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and Galaxy NX (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR Digital IV was released 21 months earlier than the Galaxy NX making them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung Galaxy NX being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the GR Digital IV scores versus the Galaxy NX with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy NX Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Samsung Galaxy NX. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Samsung Galaxy NX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung Galaxy NX
GR Digital IV | Galaxy NX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 922k | Crisper display (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy NX over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
Galaxy NX | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2013 | September 2011 | Newer by 21 months | |
Display size | 4.8" | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung Galaxy NX
GR Digital IV | Galaxy NX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy NX Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has external measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy NX has sizing of 137mm x 101mm x 26mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 1.0") and a weight of 495 grams (1.09 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung Galaxy NX in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the GR Digital IV versus the Galaxy NX.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital IV and Galaxy NX is 92 and 82 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy NX Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital IV and Galaxy NX.
Clearly, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital IV due to its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more difficult and the Samsung Galaxy NX will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital IV will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy NX Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy NX Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung Galaxy NX | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung Galaxy NX |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-09-15 | 2013-06-20 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | HD TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) | 495 gr (1.09 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 137 x 101 x 26mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | 440 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $599 | $1,300 |