Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ30W

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Samsung HZ30W front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
40
Overall
37

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Samsung HZ30W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Released January 2010
  • Alternate Name is WB600
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ30W Overview

Lets look a bit more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung HZ30W, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the HZ30W (12MP) is relatively similar but the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and HZ30W (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The GR Digital IV was unveiled 21 months later than the HZ30W which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the GR Digital IV scores versus the HZ30W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung HZ30W

 GR Digital IV HZ30W 
ReleasedSeptember 2011January 2010Fresher by 21 months
Screen resolution1230k230kClearer screen (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 HZ30W GR Digital IV 

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung HZ30W

 GR Digital IV HZ30W 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has got physical measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung HZ30W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung HZ30W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the GR Digital IV vs the HZ30W.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ30W size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and HZ30W is 92 and 91 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ30W top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing only by going over technical specs. The graphic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital IV and HZ30W.

As you have seen, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung HZ30W will deliver extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The newer GR Digital IV provides a benefit in sensor technology.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ30W sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography highlights
Samsung HZ30W Portrait photography highlights
41
has manual focus
exports RAW files
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
29
has manual focus
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography highlights
Samsung HZ30W Street photography highlights
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (245 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Sports photography with Samsung HZ30W
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great battery power (390 per charge)
can't change focal length (28mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect auto focus
42
excellent zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking focus
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography factors
Samsung HZ30W Travel photography factors
67
great battery power (390 per charge)
has built in flash
very good max aperture (f1.9)
megapixel count low (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
63
lighter than others in class (245g)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
very long reach (360mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography details
Samsung HZ30W Landscape photography details
53
has manual focus
very good max aperture (f1.9)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
great battery power (390 CIPA)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
43
has manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Vlogging camera
Samsung HZ30W as a Vlogging camera
29
very good max aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
no external mic port
30
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (245g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung HZ30W
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSamsung HZ30W
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR Digital IV Samsung HZ30W
Also called as - WB600
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2011-09-15 2010-01-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 24-360mm (15.0x)
Max aperture f/1.9 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing distance 1cm 3cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 secs 16 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 190 gr (0.42 lb) 245 gr (0.54 lb)
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 390 pictures -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB65 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $599 $280