Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Introduced September 2011
  • Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Revealed June 2010
  • Also referred to as WB650
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

Following is a extended review of the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung HZ35W, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is relatively comparable but the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and HZ35W (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The GR Digital IV was unveiled 16 months after the HZ35W which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the GR Digital IV scores against the HZ35W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung HZ35W

 GR Digital IV HZ35W 
RevealedSeptember 2011June 2010More modern by 16 months
Screen resolution1230k614kSharper screen (+616k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 HZ35W GR Digital IV 

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung HZ35W

 GR Digital IV HZ35W 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers outer measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

See the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung HZ35W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the GR Digital IV versus the HZ35W.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital IV and HZ35W is 92 and 91 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The image here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and HZ35W.

Clearly, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung HZ35W will provide extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The newer GR Digital IV will have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography details
Samsung HZ35W Portrait photography details
41
focusing manually
supports RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
34
you can focus manually
comes with face detection focusing
no external flash support
resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Street photography with Samsung HZ35W
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/1.7")
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (245 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography factors
Samsung HZ35W Sports photography factors
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery pack (390 CIPA)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
no phase detect AF
42
amazing zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking autofocus
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography highlights
Samsung HZ35W Travel photography highlights
67
better than average battery pack (390 shots)
flash built-in
great max aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
63
lighter than others (245g)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long zoom (360mm)
no Timelapse mode
resolution not great (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography details
Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography details
53
focusing manually
great max aperture (f1.9)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
better than average battery pack (390 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
43
you can focus manually
relatively wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Vlogging with Samsung HZ35W
29
great max aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic support
31
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
lighter than others (245g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung HZ35W
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSamsung HZ35W
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Digital IV Samsung HZ35W
Also Known as - WB650
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2011-09-15 2010-06-16
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 24-360mm (15.0x)
Largest aperture f/1.9 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus distance 1cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,230 thousand dots 614 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1 seconds 16 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 190 grams (0.42 pounds) 245 grams (0.54 pounds)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 390 pictures -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model DB65 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $599 $300