Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Revealed May 2010
- Also Known as WB5500
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung HZ50W, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and HZ50W (14MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and HZ50W (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR Digital IV was announced 17 months later than the HZ50W which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the GR Digital IV grades against the HZ50W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Samsung HZ50W. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung HZ50W
GR Digital IV | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | May 2010 | Fresher by 17 months | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
HZ50W | GR Digital IV |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung HZ50W
GR Digital IV | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers physical measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung HZ50W has measurements of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung HZ50W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the HZ50W.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital IV and HZ50W is 92 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing merely by looking through specs. The photograph below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital IV and HZ50W.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung HZ50W will render more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher GR Digital IV provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung HZ50W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung HZ50W |
Also referred to as | - | WB5500 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-09-15 | 2010-05-03 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 5.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 426g (0.94 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB65 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $599 | $250 |