Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Samsung HZ50W front
Portability
70
Imaging
37
Features
44
Overall
39

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Samsung HZ50W
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
  • Revealed May 2010
  • Also Known as WB5500
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung HZ50W, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and HZ50W (14MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and HZ50W (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The GR Digital IV was announced 17 months later than the HZ50W which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving into a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the GR Digital IV grades against the HZ50W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung HZ50W

 GR Digital IV HZ50W 
RevealedSeptember 2011May 2010Fresher by 17 months
Screen resolution1230k230kClearer screen (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 HZ50W GR Digital IV 

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung HZ50W

 GR Digital IV HZ50W 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers physical measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung HZ50W has measurements of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung HZ50W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the HZ50W.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital IV and HZ50W is 92 and 70 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing merely by looking through specs. The photograph below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital IV and HZ50W.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung HZ50W will render more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher GR Digital IV provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography details
Samsung HZ50W Portrait photography details
41
focusing manually
supports RAW formats
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
46
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (14MP)
exports RAW formats
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography info
Samsung HZ50W Street photography info
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/1.7")
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography factors
Samsung HZ50W Sports photography factors
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good battery pack (390 shots)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect autofocus
48
incredible zoom range (26-676mm 26.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography features
Samsung HZ50W Travel photography features
67
good battery pack (390 shots)
has built in flash
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
megapixel count low (10MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
58
decent megapixels (14MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
very long reach (676mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung HZ50W as a Landscape photography camera
53
focusing manually
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
good battery pack (390 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
51
you can focus manually
pretty wide (26mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
exports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Vlogging camera
Samsung HZ50W as a Vlogging camera
29
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external microphone jack
24
pretty wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung HZ50W
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSamsung HZ50W
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR Digital IV Samsung HZ50W
Also referred to as - WB5500
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2011-09-15 2010-05-03
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Max boosted ISO - 6400
Min native ISO 80 64
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 26-676mm (26.0x)
Largest aperture f/1.9 f/2.8-5.0
Macro focusing range 1cm 10cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) Electronic
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 secs 16 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 5.60 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 190g (0.42 pounds) 426g (0.94 pounds)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 390 photos -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB65 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SC/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $599 $250