Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX200
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX100
- New Model is Samsung NX210
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX200, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and NX200 (APS-C) offer different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR Digital IV was unveiled 5 months prior to the NX200 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the GR Digital IV scores against the NX200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung NX200. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung NX200
GR Digital IV | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 614k | Crisper display (+616k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
NX200 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung NX200
GR Digital IV | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | February 2012 | Same generation | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV features outside dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX200 has sizing of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the NX200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital IV and NX200 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by going through specs. The visual here might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital IV and NX200.
All in all, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital IV using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Samsung NX200 will provide greater detail having an extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung NX200 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-09-15 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) | 223 grams (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | 330 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB65 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $599 | $818 |