Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX2000
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
89 Imaging
63 Features
68 Overall
65
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Succeeded the Samsung NX1100
- Replacement is Samsung NX3000
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung NX2000, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and NX2000 (20MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and NX2000 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR Digital IV was introduced 3 years before the NX2000 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the GR Digital IV matches up vs the NX2000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung NX2000. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung NX2000
GR Digital IV | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 1152k | Crisper display (+78k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
NX2000 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2013 | September 2011 | Fresher by 26 months | |
Display dimension | 3.7" | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung NX2000
GR Digital IV | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has got exterior dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung NX2000 has measurements of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung NX2000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the GR Digital IV and the NX2000.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and NX2000 is 92 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specifications. The photograph below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and NX2000.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV with its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Samsung NX2000 will offer you more detail using its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung NX2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung NX2000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2011-09-15 | 2013-11-30 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,230 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 228 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 75 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 908 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | 340 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $599 | $599 |