Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX300
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX210
- Renewed by Samsung NX500
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung NX300, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and NX300 (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR Digital IV was manufactured 3 years prior to the NX300 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the GR Digital IV grades against the NX300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Samsung NX300. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung NX300
GR Digital IV | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | 768k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
NX300 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2013 | September 2011 | More recent by 26 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung NX300
GR Digital IV | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital IV provides outer measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung NX300 has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung NX300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the GR Digital IV and the NX300.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and NX300 is 92 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching specifications. The photograph below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and NX300.
Plainly, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital IV due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh tougher and the Samsung NX300 will result in greater detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung NX300 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-09-15 | 2013-11-24 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3.3" |
Resolution of display | 1,230k dot | 768k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 331 grams (0.73 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | 330 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB65 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $599 | $750 |