Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL202
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Let's look closer at the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is relatively close but the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and SL202 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GR Digital IV was launched 2 years after the SL202 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the GR Digital IV matches up vs the SL202 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung SL202. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung SL202
| GR Digital IV | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 32 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
| SL202 | GR Digital IV |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung SL202
| GR Digital IV | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has exterior dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung SL202 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the GR Digital IV and the SL202.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and SL202 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes only by viewing specifications. The image here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and SL202.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact MP albeit different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV provides the bigger sensor which will make achieving bokeh simpler. The fresher GR Digital IV provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called | - | PL50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-09-15 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lbs) | 168g (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB65 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $599 | $140 |