Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL30
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Also Known as ES15
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL30 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung SL30, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the SL30 (10MP) is relatively close but the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and SL30 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR Digital IV was launched 2 years later than the SL30 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the GR Digital IV scores versus the SL30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL30 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Samsung SL30. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Samsung SL30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung SL30
| GR Digital IV | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2011 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 32 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
| SL30 | GR Digital IV |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung SL30
| GR Digital IV | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL30 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV provides exterior measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung SL30 has dimensions of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung SL30 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the SL30.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and SL30 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL30 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by researching specifications. The visual below will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and SL30.
To sum up, both cameras feature the identical MP albeit different sensor measurements. The GR Digital IV contains the bigger sensor which is going to make getting bokeh simpler. The more modern GR Digital IV should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL30 Specifications
| Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung SL30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung SL30 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ES15 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-09-15 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 1,230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) | 140 grams (0.31 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB65 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $599 | $93 |
