Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST100
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Old Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST100 Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST100, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and ST100 (14MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and ST100 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR Digital IV was unveiled 21 months after the ST100 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the GR Digital IV grades vs the ST100 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST100 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Samsung ST100. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Samsung ST100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung ST100
GR Digital IV | ST100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | January 2010 | Newer by 21 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 1230k | 1152k | Crisper screen (+78k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST100 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
ST100 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung ST100
GR Digital IV | ST100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST100 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV provides physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung ST100 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST100 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the GR Digital IV vs the ST100.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital IV and ST100 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST100 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The image underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital IV and ST100.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital IV using its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Samsung ST100 will result in more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern GR Digital IV is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung ST100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung ST100 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2011-09-15 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.6-4.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,230k dot | 1,152k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $599 | $250 |