Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST65

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Introduced September 2011
  • Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Released January 2011
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST65 Overview

Following is a extended overview of the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung ST65, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and ST65 (14MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and ST65 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The GR Digital IV was manufactured 8 months after the ST65 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the GR Digital IV scores against the ST65 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung ST65

 GR Digital IV ST65 
ReleasedSeptember 2011January 2011More modern by 8 months
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Display resolution1230k460kCrisper display (+770k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 ST65 GR Digital IV 

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung ST65

 GR Digital IV ST65 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display dimensions
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung ST65 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung ST65 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the ST65.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital IV and ST65 is 92 and 99 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching specifications. The picture below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital IV and ST65.

Plainly, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung ST65 will render more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more recent GR Digital IV will have an advantage in sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography info
Samsung ST65 Portrait photography info
41
you can focus manually
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
28
decent MP (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Street photography with Samsung ST65
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
49
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
max ISO too low (0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography features
Samsung ST65 Sports photography features
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery life (390 CIPA)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect AF
26
decent MP (14MP)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Travel photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Travel photography camera
67
better than average battery life (390 per charge)
flash built-in
great max aperture (f1.9)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
71
decent MP (14MP)
has built in flash
fast max aperture (f)
no Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Landscape photography camera
53
you can focus manually
great max aperture (f1.9)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
better than average battery life (390 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
37
fast max aperture (f)
screen size is decent (3")
decent MP (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (0)
no RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging highlights
Samsung ST65 Vlogging highlights
29
great max aperture (f1.9)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have microphone support
27
fast max aperture (f)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung ST65
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSamsung ST65
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR Digital IV Samsung ST65
Class Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Introduced 2011-09-15 2011-01-19
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 -
Minimum native ISO 80 -
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) ()
Maximal aperture f/1.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 190g (0.42 lbs) -
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 390 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB65 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal -
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $599 $130