Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Samsung ST93 front
Portability
97
Imaging
39
Features
20
Overall
31

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Samsung ST93
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Revealed April 2011
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93 Overview

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung ST93, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and ST93 (16MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and ST93 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The GR Digital IV was revealed 5 months later than the ST93 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the GR Digital IV grades versus the ST93 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung ST93

 GR Digital IV ST93 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display resolution1230k460kClearer display (+770k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 ST93 GR Digital IV 

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung ST93

 GR Digital IV ST93 
RevealedSeptember 2011April 2011Similar age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has got outside dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung ST93 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).

Check the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung ST93 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the ST93.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and ST93 is 92 and 97 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over technical specs. The graphic below will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital IV and ST93.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung ST93 will offer greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung ST93 as a Portrait photography camera
41
you can focus manually
supports RAW formats
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
30
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography information
Samsung ST93 Street photography information
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
49
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography advice
Samsung ST93 Sports photography advice
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery pack (390 CIPA)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect auto focus
27
resolution is good (16MP)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Travel photography with Samsung ST93
67
better than average battery pack (390 per charge)
flash built-in
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
MP count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
70
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
very good max aperture (f)
no Timelapse function
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography features
Samsung ST93 Landscape photography features
53
you can focus manually
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
better than average battery pack (390 shots)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
38
very good max aperture (f)
good sized screen (3 inches)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging advice
Samsung ST93 Vlogging advice
29
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external microphone jack
27
very good max aperture (f)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung ST93
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSamsung ST93
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Digital IV Samsung ST93
Type Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Revealed 2011-09-15 2011-04-20
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) ()
Max aperture f/1.9 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 190 gr (0.42 lbs) 110 gr (0.24 lbs)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 390 shots -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model DB65 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal -
Storage slots One One
Retail price $599 -