Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
97 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed April 2011
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung ST93, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and ST93 (16MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and ST93 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR Digital IV was revealed 5 months later than the ST93 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the GR Digital IV grades versus the ST93 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Samsung ST93. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung ST93
GR Digital IV | ST93 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Clearer display (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
ST93 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung ST93
GR Digital IV | ST93 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | April 2011 | Similar age | |
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has got outside dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung ST93 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung ST93 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the ST93.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and ST93 is 92 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over technical specs. The graphic below will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital IV and ST93.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung ST93 will offer greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung ST93 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung ST93 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2011-09-15 | 2011-04-20 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | () |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) | 110 gr (0.24 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $599 | - |