Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL205
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also referred to as PL100
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL205 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung TL205, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the TL205 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and TL205 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR Digital IV was released 21 months after the TL205 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the GR Digital IV matches up vs the TL205 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung TL205. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung TL205
GR Digital IV | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2011 | January 2010 | Newer by 21 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
TL205 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung TL205
GR Digital IV | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers outside measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL205 has dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung TL205 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the GR Digital IV and the TL205.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and TL205 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions merely by going through a spec sheet. The image here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and TL205.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital IV because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung TL205 will produce extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer GR Digital IV provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung TL205 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung TL205 |
Otherwise known as | - | PL100 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-09-15 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.0-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 177 grams (0.39 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $599 | $180 |