Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced September 2011
- Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2009
- Alternative Name is ST550
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung TL225, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is relatively close but the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and TL225 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR Digital IV was revealed 2 years after the TL225 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GR Digital IV scores vs the TL225 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung TL225. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung TL225
GR Digital IV | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | August 2009 | Newer by 26 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 1230k | 1152k | Crisper screen (+78k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
TL225 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung TL225
GR Digital IV | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has got exterior dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung TL225 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung TL225 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital IV versus the TL225.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and TL225 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by researching technical specs. The pic below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital IV and TL225.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital IV with its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Samsung TL225 will result in more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger GR Digital IV should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung TL225 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung TL225 |
Also called | - | ST550 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2011-09-15 | 2009-08-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
Display resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 187 grams (0.41 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB65 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $599 | $488 |