Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Samsung TL225 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
33
Overall
34

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Announced September 2011
  • Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Samsung TL225
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
  • Introduced August 2009
  • Alternative Name is ST550
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225 Overview

On this page, we will be comparing the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung TL225, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is relatively close but the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and TL225 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GR Digital IV was revealed 2 years after the TL225 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GR Digital IV scores vs the TL225 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung TL225

 GR Digital IV TL225 
IntroducedSeptember 2011August 2009Newer by 26 months
Manually focus More precise focus
Screen resolution1230k1152kCrisper screen (+78k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 TL225 GR Digital IV 
Screen dimensions3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung TL225

 GR Digital IV TL225 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has got exterior dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung TL225 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung TL225 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital IV versus the TL225.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and TL225 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by researching technical specs. The pic below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital IV and TL225.

As you have seen, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital IV with its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Samsung TL225 will result in more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger GR Digital IV should have a benefit in sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Portrait photography with Samsung TL225
41
focusing manually
supports RAW formats
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
21
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography details
Samsung TL225 Street photography details
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/1.7")
59
image stabilization (Optical)
includes focus via touch
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
heavier than competitors (187 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography details
Samsung TL225 Sports photography details
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good battery pack (390 per charge)
can't change focal length (28mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
has no phase detect AF
27
image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography highlights
Samsung TL225 Travel photography highlights
67
good battery pack (390 shots)
has built in flash
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
megapixel count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
59
includes focus via touch
flash built-in
relatively wide (27mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors (187g)
low megapixels (12MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography factors
Samsung TL225 Landscape photography factors
53
focusing manually
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
good battery pack (390 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
37
relatively wide (27mm)
bigger than average screen (3.5 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Vlogging camera
Samsung TL225 as a Vlogging camera
29
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of mic support
29
relatively wide (27mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic socket
heavier than competitors (187g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL225 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung TL225
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSamsung TL225
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR Digital IV Samsung TL225
Also called - ST550
Category Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Announced 2011-09-15 2009-08-13
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 27-124mm (4.6x)
Max aperture f/1.9 f/3.5-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3.5"
Display resolution 1,230 thousand dots 1,152 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.40 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 190 grams (0.42 pounds) 187 grams (0.41 pounds)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 390 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB65 SLB-07A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $599 $488