Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL320
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Also Known as WB1000
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung TL320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and TL320 (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR Digital IV was announced 2 years later than the TL320 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the GR Digital IV matches up versus the TL320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung TL320. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung TL320
GR Digital IV | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | February 2009 | More recent by 32 months | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 460k | Clearer screen (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
TL320 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung TL320
GR Digital IV | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV enjoys exterior measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has sizing of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung TL320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the GR Digital IV versus the TL320.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and TL320 is 92 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital IV and TL320.
Clearly, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital IV with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung TL320 will produce extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher GR Digital IV provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung TL320 |
Also Known as | - | WB1000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2011-09-15 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lb) | - |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $599 | $380 |