Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB1100F
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Released January 2014
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB1100F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and WB1100F (16MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and WB1100F (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR Digital IV was unveiled 3 years before the WB1100F which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short introduction of how the GR Digital IV matches up against the WB1100F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Samsung WB1100F. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung WB1100F
GR Digital IV | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Sharper display (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
WB1100F | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | September 2011 | More modern by 28 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB1100F
GR Digital IV | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV comes with exterior dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB1100F has sizing of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") with a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB1100F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the GR Digital IV vs the WB1100F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and WB1100F is 92 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by going over technical specs. The picture here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and WB1100F.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung WB1100F will offer you extra detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital IV is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung WB1100F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung WB1100F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-09-15 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 512g (1.13 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB65 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $599 | $250 |