Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Samsung WB2200F front
Portability
59
Imaging
40
Features
48
Overall
43

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Introduced September 2011
  • Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Samsung WB2200F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
  • Released January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB2200F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and WB2200F (16MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and WB2200F (1/2.3") have different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The GR Digital IV was manufactured 3 years prior to the WB2200F which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the GR Digital IV scores vs the WB2200F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung WB2200F

 GR Digital IV WB2200F 
Display resolution1230k460kCrisper display (+770k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 WB2200F GR Digital IV 
ReleasedJanuary 2014September 2011More modern by 28 months

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB2200F

 GR Digital IV WB2200F 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display size
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has got outer dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has dimensions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") along with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB2200F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the WB2200F.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and WB2200F is 92 and 59 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through specifications. The image here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and WB2200F.

To sum up, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Samsung WB2200F will provide you with more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital IV will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB2200F as a Portrait photography camera
41
has manual focus
saves RAW files
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
44
you can focus manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography highlights
Samsung WB2200F Street photography highlights
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
heavier than others in class (708g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB2200F Sports photography highlights
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great battery (390 CIPA)
can't change focal length (28mm)
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
has no phase detect auto focus
53
amazing zoom range (20-1200mm 60.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
offers tracking focus
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography advice
Samsung WB2200F Travel photography advice
67
great battery (390 CIPA)
built-in flash
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
51
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (20mm)
very long reach (1200mm)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than others in class (708g)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB2200F Landscape photography highlights
53
has manual focus
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
great battery (390 per charge)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
46
you can focus manually
quite wide (20mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB2200F as a Vlogging camera
29
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external microphone socket
25
quite wide (20mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
no mic support
heavier than others in class (708g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB2200F
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSamsung WB2200F
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR Digital IV Samsung WB2200F
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2011-09-15 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 20-1200mm (60.0x)
Largest aperture f/1.9 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 200 thousand dots
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1s 1/8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate - 8.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 6.00 m (ISO Auto)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 190g (0.42 lb) 708g (1.56 lb)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 390 photos -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB65 BP-1410
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD, SDHC, SCXC
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $599 $599