Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Released January 2014
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB2200F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and WB2200F (16MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and WB2200F (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR Digital IV was manufactured 3 years prior to the WB2200F which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the GR Digital IV scores vs the WB2200F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Samsung WB2200F. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung WB2200F
GR Digital IV | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Crisper display (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
WB2200F | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | September 2011 | More modern by 28 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB2200F
GR Digital IV | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has got outer dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has dimensions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") along with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB2200F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the WB2200F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and WB2200F is 92 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through specifications. The image here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and WB2200F.
To sum up, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Samsung WB2200F will provide you with more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital IV will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung WB2200F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-09-15 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dots |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 1/8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 708g (1.56 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB65 | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $599 | $599 |