Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB30F

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Samsung WB30F front
Portability
96
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
  • Released January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB30F Overview

Let's examine more in depth at the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and WB30F (16MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and WB30F (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GR Digital IV was introduced 16 months prior to the WB30F which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the GR Digital IV matches up vs the WB30F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung WB30F

 GR Digital IV WB30F 
Focus manually Very precise focus
Screen resolution1230k230kClearer screen (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 WB30F GR Digital IV 
ReleasedJanuary 2013September 2011More modern by 16 months

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB30F

 GR Digital IV WB30F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurement
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV comes with outer dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB30F has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB30F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the GR Digital IV versus the WB30F.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB30F size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital IV and WB30F is 92 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out specs. The picture underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and WB30F.

All in all, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB30F will show more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital IV will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography information
Samsung WB30F Portrait photography information
41
focusing manually
saves RAW files
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
35
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
provides face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography information
Samsung WB30F Street photography information
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
64
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (128 grams)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Sports photography with Samsung WB30F
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good battery (390 shots)
fixed focal length (28mm)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
no phase detect auto focus
45
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Travel photography camera
67
good battery (390 CIPA)
has built in flash
very good max aperture (f1.9)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
69
lighter than competition in class (128g)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
no Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography information
Samsung WB30F Landscape photography information
53
focusing manually
very good max aperture (f1.9)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
good battery (390 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
43
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Vlogging with Samsung WB30F
29
very good max aperture (f1.9)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have microphone port
33
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
lighter than competition in class (128 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB30F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB30F
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSamsung WB30F
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR Digital IV Samsung WB30F
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2011-09-15 2013-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Max aperture f/1.9 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - QVGA TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 1s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 190 grams (0.42 pounds) 128 grams (0.28 pounds)
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 390 photographs -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB65 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $599 $180