Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2014
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and WB350F (16MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and WB350F (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR Digital IV was announced 3 years prior to the WB350F which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the GR Digital IV scores against the WB350F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung WB350F
GR Digital IV | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Crisper display (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
WB350F | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | September 2011 | Newer by 28 months | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB350F
GR Digital IV | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV enjoys outer dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital IV vs the WB350F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital IV and WB350F is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by going over specs. The picture here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and WB350F.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital IV with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB350F will offer more detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital IV is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung WB350F |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-09-15 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lb) | 276 gr (0.61 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB65 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $599 | $260 |