Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F Overview

The following is a complete comparison of the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and WB350F (16MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and WB350F (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The GR Digital IV was announced 3 years prior to the WB350F which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the GR Digital IV scores against the WB350F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung WB350F

 GR Digital IV WB350F 
Display resolution1230k460kCrisper display (+770k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 WB350F GR Digital IV 
RevealedJanuary 2014September 2011Newer by 28 months
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB350F

 GR Digital IV WB350F 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

When you are intending to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV enjoys outer dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital IV vs the WB350F.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital IV and WB350F is 92 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by going over specs. The picture here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and WB350F.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital IV with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB350F will offer more detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital IV is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography advice
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography advice
41
focusing manually
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
40
has manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography advice
Samsung WB350F Street photography advice
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (276g)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Sports photography camera
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good battery life (390 shots)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low megapixels (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect AF
50
long zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography info
Samsung WB350F Travel photography info
67
good battery life (390 shots)
flash built-in
good max aperture (f1.9)
low megapixels (10MP)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
69
lighter than competitors (276g)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (23mm)
long reach (483mm)
no Timelapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography features
Samsung WB350F Landscape photography features
53
focusing manually
good max aperture (f1.9)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (390 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low megapixels (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
50
has manual focus
rather wide (23mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Vlogging with Samsung WB350F
29
good max aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
no mic jack
34
rather wide (23mm)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (276 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
no external microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB350F
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSamsung WB350F
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR Digital IV Samsung WB350F
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2011-09-15 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximal aperture f/1.9 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 secs 16 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 190 gr (0.42 lb) 276 gr (0.61 lb)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 390 photos -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB65 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots One One
Launch cost $599 $260