Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB50F
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Announced January 2014
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB50F Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB50F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and WB50F (16MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and WB50F (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GR Digital IV was revealed 3 years before the WB50F which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the GR Digital IV grades against the WB50F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB50F. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung WB50F
GR Digital IV | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | 460k | Clearer screen (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
WB50F | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | September 2011 | More modern by 28 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB50F
GR Digital IV | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB50F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the GR Digital IV vs the WB50F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and WB50F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and WB50F.
As you can tell, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB50F will give you greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital IV is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung WB50F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung WB50F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-09-15 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1s | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) | 207 grams (0.46 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB65 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $599 | $180 |