Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66cf9/66cf9a75906dc0e9f2d3d249d34bb9f3f9d5798c" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV front Ricoh GR Digital IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ec74/7ec74ffc74df7a1174a1a0d12e55c19e0c4feb84" alt="Sigma DP2 front Sigma DP2 front"
86 Imaging
44 Features
28 Overall
37
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Released September 2009
- Renewed by Sigma DP2s
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Sigma. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and DP2 (5MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and DP2 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The GR Digital IV was announced 2 years later than the DP2 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the GR Digital IV scores versus the DP2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Sigma DP2. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Sigma DP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sigma DP2
GR Digital IV | DP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2011 | ![]() | September 2009 | More recent by 25 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
DP2 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sigma DP2
GR Digital IV | DP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital IV features physical measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 has proportions of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") having a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the GR Digital IV versus the DP2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a109/4a1092a204af792600bbe94d00d65d019e0e0c07" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 size comparison Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and DP2 is 92 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ab19/5ab19070fcf411736d11b0d5b73ffb80499abaea" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 top view buttons comparison Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by checking out specifications. The graphic underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital IV and DP2.
To sum up, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital IV using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh tougher and the Ricoh GR Digital IV will produce greater detail with its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The newer GR Digital IV provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d5a8/0d5a8368770bc5e68cac68c68887764f1910d7ad" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 sensor size comparison Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b605/1b6059597ea35a2ba0bd349c99662ef04258a9c2" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sigma DP2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sigma DP2 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-09-15 | 2009-09-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 2640 x 1760 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 41mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 15s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 320x240 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lbs) | 280g (0.62 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/MMC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $599 | $649 |