Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46cfd/46cfd6b1b2504d733a07dd4a231b6abe09baa859" alt="Sigma SD1 Merrill front Sigma SD1 Merrill front"
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Released April 2012
- Superseded the Sigma SD1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Ricoh and Sigma. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is very similar but the WG-4 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The WG-4 was manufactured 23 months later than the SD1 Merrill making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the WG-4 grades versus the SD1 Merrill when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
WG-4 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | April 2012 | More recent by 23 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Ricoh WG-4
SD1 Merrill | WG-4 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
WG-4 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 provides outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has sizing of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-4 against the SD1 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43624/4362419a28b3b7ec280330bd44ec44b045eb91b0" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and SD1 Merrill is 90 and 57 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ce48/9ce481be10e35e6532f1dd09d19d726539a746db" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading specs. The graphic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and SD1 Merrill.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-4 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Ricoh WG-4 will offer extra detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The younger WG-4 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94b4f/94b4f75d53a725a3b64649be639d65c00b185760" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ca15/6ca15b5ebd2a57c63441b62d63e80ab86e678c0c" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2012-04-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4800 x 3200 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 790 grams (1.74 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $330 | $2,339 |