Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Introduced September 2011
  • Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Released February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) feature different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The GR Digital IV was released 3 years prior to the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short overview of how the GR Digital IV scores vs the DP2 Quattro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 GR Digital IV DP2 Quattro 
Screen resolution1230k920kClearer screen (+310k dot)

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 DP2 Quattro GR Digital IV 
ReleasedFebruary 2014September 2011Fresher by 29 months

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 GR Digital IV DP2 Quattro 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry your camera, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital IV features external measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the GR Digital IV versus the DP2 Quattro.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and DP2 Quattro is 92 and 70 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by looking through specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and DP2 Quattro.

Plainly, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
41
has manual focus
supports RAW files
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
77
manual focus
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
has face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography highlights
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/1.7")
61
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography factors
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery pack (390 shots)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect AF
48
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography info
67
better than average battery pack (390 CIPA)
built-in flash
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
53
good MP (20MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography info
53
has manual focus
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
better than average battery pack (390 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
59
manual focus
good sized screen (3")
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging highlights
29
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
missing mic socket
9
no video recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Make Ricoh Sigma
Model type Ricoh GR Digital IV Sigma DP2 Quattro
Class Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2011-09-15 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 45mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/1.9 f/2.8
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 1 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 190g (0.42 lbs) 395g (0.87 lbs)
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 390 images -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB65 BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal -
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $599 $931