Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Released February 2014
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) feature different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR Digital IV was released 3 years prior to the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short overview of how the GR Digital IV scores vs the DP2 Quattro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
GR Digital IV | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | 920k | Clearer screen (+310k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
DP2 Quattro | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | September 2011 | Fresher by 29 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sigma DP2 Quattro
GR Digital IV | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital IV features external measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the GR Digital IV versus the DP2 Quattro.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and DP2 Quattro is 92 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by looking through specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and DP2 Quattro.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-09-15 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 45mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lbs) | 395g (0.87 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB65 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $599 | $931 |