Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma SD9
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Announced November 2002
- Refreshed by Sigma SD10
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma SD9 Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sigma SD9, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and SD9 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR Digital IV was released 8 years after the SD9 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a short overview of how the GR Digital IV matches up against the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sigma SD9. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sigma SD9
GR Digital IV | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2011 | November 2002 | Newer by 108 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 130k | Clearer screen (+1100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
SD9 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sigma SD9
GR Digital IV | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sigma SD9 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the GR Digital IV against the SD9.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital IV and SD9 is 92 and 54 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specifications. The image underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital IV and SD9.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital IV due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Ricoh GR Digital IV will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent GR Digital IV provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sigma SD9 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2011-09-15 | 2002-11-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 3MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 2268 x 1512 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,230k dots | 130k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) | 950 gr (2.09 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $599 | $3,001 |