Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A7 III
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
63 Imaging
74 Features
92 Overall
81
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A7 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Raise to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 650g - 127 x 96 x 74mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Old Model is Sony A7 II
- Newer Model is Sony A7 IV
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A7 III Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sony A7 III, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and A7 III (24MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and A7 III (Full frame) posses different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GR Digital IV was released 7 years prior to the A7 III which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony A7 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the GR Digital IV scores vs the A7 III with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A7 III Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Sony Alpha A7 III. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Sony A7 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony A7 III
GR Digital IV | A7 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 922k | Crisper display (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A7 III over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
A7 III | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | September 2011 | More modern by 78 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A7 III
GR Digital IV | A7 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A7 III Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers external measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony A7 III has measurements of 127mm x 96mm x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") and a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sony A7 III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the A7 III.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital IV and A7 III is 92 and 63 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A7 III Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The pic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and A7 III.
Plainly, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony A7 III will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 14MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital IV is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A7 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A7 III Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha A7 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha A7 III |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2011-09-15 | 2018-02-27 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 51200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p) 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 650 grams (1.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 127 x 96 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 96 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3730 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | 610 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | 2 |
Price at launch | $599 | $1,998 |