Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A200
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Revealed July 2008
- New Model is Sony A230
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A200 Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A200, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the A200 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and A200 (APS-C) offer different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GR Digital IV was unveiled 3 years after the A200 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the GR Digital IV scores versus the A200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony A200
GR Digital IV | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | July 2008 | More modern by 39 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
A200 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A200
GR Digital IV | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV features physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the GR Digital IV versus the A200.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and A200 is 92 and 66 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes merely by going through a spec sheet. The pic here might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and A200.
Clearly, both the cameras feature the identical resolution albeit different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV features the smaller sensor which is going to make achieving shallow DOF harder. The fresher GR Digital IV provides an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A200 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2011-09-15 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 572g (1.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $599 | $100 |