Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A230

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front
Portability
69
Imaging
50
Features
40
Overall
46

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A230 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
Sony A230
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 490g - 128 x 97 x 68mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Old Model is Sony A200
  • Replacement is Sony A290
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A230 Overview

Below, we will be contrasting the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A230, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the A230 (10MP) is pretty well matched but the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and A230 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The GR Digital IV was brought out 2 years after the A230 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony A230 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the GR Digital IV grades vs the A230 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony A230

 GR Digital IV A230 
ReleasedSeptember 2011May 2009More modern by 29 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1230k230kClearer screen (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A230 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 A230 GR Digital IV 

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A230

 GR Digital IV A230 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A230 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV provides external dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony A230 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") having a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A230 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the GR Digital IV against the A230.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A230 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and A230 is 92 and 69 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A230 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's hard to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The picture here may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital IV and A230.

To sum up, each of these cameras posses the exact same MP albeit not the same sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV has got the tinier sensor which will make obtaining bokeh more difficult. The fresher GR Digital IV is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A230 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography details
Sony A230 Portrait photography details
41
you can focus manually
exports RAW formats
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
54
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
doesn't have liveview
low MP (10MP)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Street photography with Sony A230
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/1.7")
67
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no moving screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography factors
Sony A230 Sports photography factors
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery power (390 shots)
can't change focal length (28mm)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect AF
46
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
low MP (10 megapixels)
not so great battery (230 shots)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Travel photography with Sony A230
67
better than average battery power (390 shots)
has built in flash
great max aperture (f1.9)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
45
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
not so great battery (230 CIPA)
low MP (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Landscape photography with Sony A230
53
you can focus manually
great max aperture (f1.9)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
better than average battery power (390 shots)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
51
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
small screen (2.7")
doesn't have liveview
low MP (10MP)
not so great battery (230 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging factors
Sony A230 Vlogging factors
29
great max aperture (f1.9)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external mic support
9
no video recording
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A230 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A230
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSony Alpha DSLR-A230
General Information
Brand Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh GR Digital IV Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
Class Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2011-09-15 2009-05-18
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) -
Max aperture f/1.9 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Number of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 4.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 1,230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m 10.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 190 grams (0.42 lb) 490 grams (1.08 lb)
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 128 x 97 x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 63
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.3
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.4
DXO Low light score not tested 531
Other
Battery life 390 pictures 230 pictures
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model DB65 NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $599 $569