Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A300

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Introduced September 2011
  • Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Released January 2008
  • Successor is Sony A330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A300 Overview

Following is a extensive analysis of the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the A300 (10MP) is fairly close but the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and A300 (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The GR Digital IV was manufactured 3 years after the A300 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the GR Digital IV matches up against the A300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony A300

 GR Digital IV A300 
ReleasedSeptember 2011January 2008More modern by 45 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k230kCrisper display (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 A300 GR Digital IV 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A300

 GR Digital IV A300 
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has got outer measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony A300 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the GR Digital IV versus the A300.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A300 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and A300 is 92 and 64 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The picture underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital IV and A300.

As you have seen, both of the cameras come with the identical resolution but different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV has the smaller sensor which should make obtaining shallow DOF tougher. The fresher GR Digital IV should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Portrait photography with Sony A300
41
focusing manually
supports RAW files
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
59
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
low resolution (10 megapixels)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography details
Sony A300 Street photography details
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/1.7")
74
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography factors
Sony A300 Sports photography factors
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good battery pack (390 shots)
fixed focal length (28mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
54
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography details
Sony A300 Travel photography details
67
good battery pack (390 CIPA)
flash built-in
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
45
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse function
low resolution (10 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Landscape photography with Sony A300
53
focusing manually
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
good battery pack (390 shots)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
57
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
does not have Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Vlogging camera
Sony A300 as a Vlogging camera
29
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone socket
9
can't record video
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A300
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Make Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh GR Digital IV Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Class Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2011-09-15 2008-01-30
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 3872 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) -
Maximum aperture f/1.9 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 4.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 1,230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Min shutter speed 1 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 190g (0.42 lbs) 632g (1.39 lbs)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 64
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 538
Other
Battery life 390 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB65 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal Compact Flash
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $599 $0