Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A390
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced September 2011
- Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Previous Model is Sony A380
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A390 Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A390, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and A390 (14MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and A390 (APS-C) come with different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR Digital IV was launched 14 months after the A390 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the GR Digital IV grades against the A390 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A390 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony A390
GR Digital IV | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | July 2010 | Newer by 14 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
A390 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A390
GR Digital IV | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital IV comes with outer dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A390 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital IV and the A390.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital IV and A390 is 92 and 66 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through technical specs. The image below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and A390.
As you can tell, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital IV because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Sony A390 will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern GR Digital IV provides an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A390 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2011-09-15 | 2010-07-28 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) | 549 gr (1.21 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | 230 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $599 | $500 |